City Stability Ranking
As Of 2024
| Rank | City | Combined Score | National Percentile | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beacon View | 91 | 100th | Improving |
| 2 | Bellevue | 91 | 100th | Improving |
| 3 | Chalco | 91 | 100th | Improving |
| 4 | Gretna | 91 | 100th | Improving |
| 5 | La Platte | 91 | 100th | Improving |
| 6 | La Vista | 91 | 100th | Improving |
| 7 | Linoma Beach | 91 | 100th | Improving |
| 8 | Melia | 91 | 100th | Improving |
| 9 | Offutt AFB | 91 | 100th | Improving |
| 10 | Papillion | 91 | 100th | Improving |
| 11 | Richfield | 91 | 100th | Improving |
| 12 | Springfield | 91 | 100th | Improving |
| 13 | Ashland | 88 | 99th | Improving |
| 14 | Cedar Bluffs | 88 | 99th | Improving |
| 15 | Ceresco | 88 | 99th | Improving |
| 16 | Colon | 88 | 99th | Improving |
| 17 | Ithaca | 88 | 99th | Improving |
| 18 | Leshara | 88 | 99th | Improving |
| 19 | Malmo | 88 | 99th | Improving |
| 20 | Mead | 88 | 99th | Improving |
| 21 | Memphis | 88 | 99th | Improving |
| 22 | Morse Bluff | 88 | 99th | Improving |
| 23 | Prague | 88 | 99th | Improving |
| 24 | Valparaiso | 88 | 99th | Improving |
| 25 | Wahoo | 88 | 99th | Improving |
| 26 | Wann | 88 | 99th | Improving |
| 27 | Weston | 88 | 99th | Improving |
| 28 | Yutan | 88 | 99th | Improving |
| 29 | Alvo | 84 | 97th | Improving |
| 30 | Avoca | 84 | 97th | Improving |
| 31 | Beaver Lake | 84 | 97th | Improving |
| 32 | Buccaneer Bay | 84 | 97th | Improving |
| 33 | Cedar Creek | 84 | 97th | Improving |
| 34 | Eagle | 84 | 97th | Improving |
| 35 | Elmwood | 84 | 97th | Improving |
| 36 | Greenwood | 84 | 97th | Improving |
| 37 | Lake Waconda | 84 | 97th | Improving |
| 38 | Louisville | 84 | 97th | Improving |
| 39 | Manley | 84 | 97th | Improving |
| 40 | Murdock | 84 | 97th | Improving |
| 41 | Murray | 84 | 97th | Improving |
| 42 | Nehawka | 84 | 97th | Improving |
| 43 | Plattsmouth | 84 | 97th | Improving |
| 44 | South Bend | 84 | 97th | Improving |
| 45 | Union | 84 | 97th | Improving |
| 46 | Weeping Water | 84 | 97th | Improving |
| 47 | Arlington | 82 | 97th | Improving |
| 48 | Blair | 82 | 97th | Improving |
| 49 | Fontanelle | 82 | 97th | Improving |
| 50 | Fort Calhoun | 82 | 97th | Improving |
| 51 | Herman | 82 | 97th | Improving |
| 52 | Kennard | 82 | 97th | Improving |
| 53 | Washington | 82 | 97th | Improving |
| 54 | Arthur | 82 | 90th | Improving |
| 55 | Aurora | 82 | 96th | Improving |
| 56 | Giltner | 82 | 96th | Improving |
| 57 | Hampton | 82 | 96th | Improving |
| 58 | Hordville | 82 | 96th | Improving |
| 59 | Marquette | 82 | 96th | Improving |
| 60 | Overland | 82 | 96th | Improving |
| 61 | Phillips | 82 | 96th | Improving |
| 62 | Stockham | 82 | 96th | Improving |
| 63 | Elwood | 80 | 95th | Improving |
| 64 | Smithfield | 80 | 95th | Improving |
| 65 | Clarkson | 79 | 95th | Improving |
| 66 | Howells | 79 | 95th | Improving |
| 67 | Leigh | 79 | 95th | Improving |
| 68 | Richland | 79 | 95th | Improving |
| 69 | Rogers | 79 | 95th | Improving |
| 70 | Schuyler | 79 | 95th | Improving |
| 71 | Brewster | 77 | 93th | Improving |
| 72 | Dunning | 77 | 93th | Improving |
| 73 | Benedict | 76 | 92th | Improving |
| 74 | Bradshaw | 76 | 92th | Improving |
| 75 | Gresham | 76 | 92th | Improving |
| 76 | Henderson | 76 | 92th | Improving |
| 77 | Lushton | 76 | 92th | Improving |
| 78 | McCool Junction | 76 | 92th | Improving |
| 79 | Thayer | 76 | 92th | Improving |
| 80 | Waco | 76 | 92th | Improving |
| 81 | York | 76 | 92th | Improving |
| 82 | Agnew | 75 | 91th | Declining |
| 83 | Bennet | 75 | 91th | Declining |
| 84 | Cheney | 75 | 91th | Declining |
| 85 | Davey | 75 | 91th | Declining |
| 86 | Denton | 75 | 91th | Declining |
| 87 | Emerald | 75 | 91th | Declining |
| 88 | Firth | 75 | 91th | Declining |
| 89 | Hallam | 75 | 91th | Declining |
| 90 | Hickman | 75 | 91th | Declining |
Educational next steps
Explore trusted economic context resources
Informational only. No forms, no lead capture, and no financial advice.
See how Nebraska is scored
Understand how Combined Score, trend direction, and percentile benchmarks are calculated.
Review methodology
Review source data used for Nebraska
Inspect source systems, update cadence, and public dataset coverage used in this model.
Open data sources
Explore federal labor data context for Nebraska
Compare this analysis with official labor market data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Open BLS data